Britain’s Culture Secretary Wants Netflix To Remind People ‘The Crown’ Is Fiction
Case in point, the "Terra Nullius" episode.
Season 4 of everyone’s favourite Wikipedia page dramatisation is causing waves once again, as Britain’s Culture Secretary called for Netflix to include a disclaimer that The Crown is fictional.
Britain’s Culture Secretary, Oliver Dowden said that The Crown is a “beautifully produced work of fiction” and, “should be very clear at the beginning it is just that”. Dowden apparently fears, ” a generation of viewers who did not live through these events may mistake fiction for fact,” and Twitter was not having it.
I’ve just watched this incredible documentary about the royal family. I’ve no idea how they gained such unprecedented intimate access to all concerned but it’s amazing. Check it out. @TheCrownNetflix 🙄
— Scott Garnham (@ScottGarnham) November 29, 2020
I just don’t know where to start with Oliver Dowden using his full powers of headed notepaper to demand Netflix proclaim The Crown is fiction, but maybe a trip round the back of the flat screen to check there aren’t little people living there
— Janine Gibson (@janinegibson) November 29, 2020
While Mr Dowden’s lack of faith in viewers’ ability to tell the difference between a documentary and period drama is hilarious, I do think Mr Dowden has a point about The Crown‘s potentially inaccurate representations of history, and how potentially irresponsible it can be.
Let’s take a look at Season 4’s Australia-set episode, ‘Terra Nullius’, its representation of the 1988 Royal tour, the absence of Aboriginal people, and Prime Minister Bob Hawke.
For starters, none of the episode was filmed in Australia, but in Malaga in Spain. The Crown‘s production team passes off Spain as Australia’s iconic landscape pretty well. Not to mention the VFX used to create the Opera House and Uluru are pretty impressive.
Malaga, Spain became Sydney (with, of course, VFX of the Opera House), & scenes were also shot inside London’s Australia House. The ep also includes Diana & Charles’ climb of Uluru in 1983, which is — of course — now closed for climbing to respect the wishes of traditional owners pic.twitter.com/mBZI8eeVca
— Netflix ANZ (@NetflixANZ) November 16, 2020
Netflix was sure to point out on Twitter that no one in the episode actually climbed Uluru, and that climbing it is no longer allowed. The production team even included archival footage of Reggie Uluru, an Elder with ties to the Pitjantjatjara Anangu and Mutitjulu nations, and a key activist in the fight for banning climbing of the sacred site.
Traditional owner and Mutitjulu man Reggie Uluru also appears in archival footage used in the episode, and has had his appearance approved by Parks Australia. A donation was also made to a Mutitjulu community charity. pic.twitter.com/LZkzNNfXHp
— Netflix ANZ (@NetflixANZ) November 16, 2020
This is all commendable, but as a Wonnarua woman, I felt The Crown‘s acknowledgement of Aboriginal people started and stopped with this inclusion of archival footage, and donation to the Mutitjulu community. Especially, in light of the episode’s title and what is actually in, or rather WHO isn’t in the episode.
no acknowledgement of how the term relates to the issue of Indigenous sovereignty. The show seems to make some kind of conceptual link between the idea of terra nullius and the marital difficulties of Charles and Diana (??). There is no representation of Aboriginal Australia –
— Melinda Cooper (@MelindaCooperJ) November 17, 2020
‘Terra Nullius’ is rife with inaccuracies regarding Bob Hawke, and the exclusion of Aboriginal people. Despite their near-total absence in the episode, when Prince Charles and Princess Diana visited Australia, they did in fact visit with Aboriginal people and communities.
Most notably, they visited Darwin’s Museum of Arts and Science and the 1988 Aboriginal Pharmacopoeia Project. There, they were met with six Aboriginal people from local communities and viewed Aboriginal art and artefacts in the museum.
On February 2nd 1988, Diana and Charles visit the Aboriginal Pharmacopoeia Project at the Northern Territory's Museum of Arts and Sciences in Darwin, the capital city of the Northern Territory of Australia pic.twitter.com/ff5iWAQNNR
— Only One Kate (@grazia747) February 2, 2019
Omitting the leg of the Royals’ 1988 tour which held their most notable interactions with Aboriginal people, and titling the episode after the doctrine the British Empire utilised to genocide Aboriginal people is, in the very least, deeply neglectful.
The episode also features recreations of interviews with Prime Minister, Bob Hawke. Specifically, an interview he gave in 1988 about the Royals visiting and Australia’s possible future as a republic. As Four Corner‘s Twitter page pointed out, The Crown‘s recreation of this interview gets the date, location and even dialogue of the interview incorrect.
(1/4) Hey @netflix 👋. Huge fan. While we’re loving the fact that you’ve featured us in @TheCrownNetflix, we’re in the business of facts and there are a few things we want to clear up. pic.twitter.com/1eIWKVXAKG
— 4corners (@4corners) November 25, 2020
Also, in 1988 when Charles and Diana visited, Hawke became the first prime minister to promise a treaty with Aboriginal people after he co-signed the Barunga statement. When he died in 2019, he was fondly remembered for his efforts by many Aboriginal elders for his allyship to Aboriginal communities.
To have an episode of a historical drama set during this specific period of Hawke’s reign as Prime Minister and neglect to mention his relationship to Aboriginal people, or Aboriginal people at all, is again, irresponsible, at best. To have a scene in which he disputes Terra Nullius without mentioning the Aboriginal people is, at best, a fiction.
Vale Bob Hawke.. and Thankyou
Let’s finish what you started .. with the Barunga Statement in 1988.
Truth. Treaty. A First Nations Voice to the Federal Parliament.
In Solidarity
Bauji bara, yo yamalu
Malarndirri pic.twitter.com/o9tuDKjXw0
— malarndirri mccarthy (@Malarndirri19) May 16, 2019
If you had told me yesterday, my staunchly anti-royalist self would spend my Monday morning agreeing with Britain’s culture secretary’s opinions on The Crown, I might have laughed in your face.
The Crown should have a disclaimer that it is fiction, but not for the sake of the Royals as Mr Dowden believes — for the sake of transparency about whose version of history is being presented, and acknowledging what and who didn’t make the cut.